import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;
@RunWith(value=Parameterized.class)
public class ParameterAnnotation {
private int number;
public ParameterAnnotation(int number) {
this.number = number;
}
private static int currentIndex, nextIndex;
@BeforeClass
public static void initClassValues(){
currentIndex=0;
nextIndex=0;
}
private static Object[][] data=new Object[5][1];
@Parameters
public static List
data[0][0]=1;
data[1][0]=2;
data[2][0]=3;
data[3][0]=4;
data[4][0]=5;
return Arrays.asList(data);
}
@Test
public void pushTest() {
assertEquals(number, data[currentIndex][nextIndex]);
currentIndex++;
}
}
2 comments:
Hello,
I have to admit I do not like the existing parameterized tests mechanism of JUnit. I like much more to use code.google.com/p/junitparams/. Also there is a new initiative which should bring much better support for such tests - see http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/message/24084
Thanks, Tomek, for the info will check out the params.
Jv
Post a Comment